Well the Big 3 wireless providers have nothing better to do (which should be providing the type of service that consumers want) have decided to sue one another over verbiage that is used in their advertising campaigns.
First TELUS sued Rogers over the use of “Canada’s most reliable network”over advertising that said that with speeds “two times faster than any other” were “fast, misleading and harmful” to its business. A B.C Supreme Court justice granted TELUS a temporary injunction against the carrier and order Rogers to take down the ads. Rogers did file an appeal and said they would take further steps in this matter.
“Rogers no longer has a network advantage, so should not be misleading the Canadian public with false superiority claims,” TELUS spokesman Shawn Hall said, adding Bell is not involved in the case.
TELUS approached Rogers on November 5 demanding that Rogers stop making the claims, but Rogers refused, TELUS filed its lawsuit November 12.
A few days later Rogers then in turn filed suit against Bell again in a B.C Supreme count. In a statement Rogers said “Bell has no valid support to claim faster speed and more reliability on a network that has virtually no customers and no proven track record on this new network.”
Should Canadians Sue Bell, Rogers And TELUS?
It is probably safe to say that a number of wireless consumers have some type of compliant against their provider, in the case of Bell, Rogers and TELUS they combined have over 90% of the market share in Canada so there will be a large number of unhappy customers. The service that is currently provided from the Big 3 Wirelss providers needs to change if the Canadian mobile industry is every to truly grow to the level that we hear about in other countries around the world.
Maybe we should ban together and sue them?
Founder of Profectio of business sites which includes 
